“The heart never takes the place of the head: but it can, and should, obey it.”
“It still remains true that no justification of virtue will enable a man to be virtuous.”
“Without the aid of trained emotions the intellect is powerless against the animal organism.”
“As the king governs by his executive, so Reason in man must rule the mere appetites by means of the ‘spirited element.'”
“A great many of those who ‘debunk’ traditional…values have in the background values of their own which they believe to be immune from the debunking process.”
“The preservation of society, and of the species itself, are ends that do not hang on the precarious thread of Reason: they are given by Instinct.”
“If we did not bring to the examinations of our instincts a knowledge of their comparative dignity we could never learn it from them.”
“An open mind, in questions that are not ultimate, is useful. But an open mind about the ultimate foundations either of Theoretical or of Practical Reason is idiocy.”
“Wherever any precept of traditional morality is simply challenged to produce its credentials, as though the burden of proof lay on it, we have taken the wrong position.”
“If we are to have values at all we must accept the ultimate platitudes of Practical Reason as having absolute validity…”
“What we call Man’s power over Nature turns out to be a power exercised by some men over other men with Nature as its instrument.”
“Man’s conquest of Nature turns out, in the moment of its consummation, to be Nature’s conquest of Man.”
“No doubt those who really founded modern science were usually those whose love of truth exceeded their love of power.”
“If nothing is self-evident, nothing can be proved. Similarly if nothing is obligatory for its own sake, nothing is obligatory at all.”
“It is in Man’s power to treat himself as a mere ‘natural object’ and his own judgements of value as raw material for scientific manipulation to alter at will. The objection to his doing so does not lie in the fact that this point of view (like one’s first day in a dissecting room) is painful and shocking till we grow used to it. . . . The real objection is that if man chooses to treat himself as raw material, raw material he will be: not raw material to be manipulated, as he fondly imagined, by himself, but by mere appetite, that is, mere Nature, in the person of his de-humanized Conditioners. . . . Either we are rational spirit obliged for ever to obey the absolute values of the Tao [natural law], or else we are mere nature to be kneaded and cut into new shapes for the pleasures of masters who must, by hypothesis, have no motive but their own ‘natural’ impulses. Only the Tao provides a common human law of action which can over-arch rulers and ruled alike. A dogmatic belief in objective value is necessary to the very idea of a rule which is not tyranny or an obedience which is not slavery. . . . The process which, if not checked, will abolish Man goes on apace among Communists and Democrats no less than among Fascists. The methods may (at first) differ in brutality. But many a mild-eyed scientist in pince-nez, many a popular dramatist, many an amateur philosopher in our midst, means in the long run just the same as the Nazi rulers of Germany.”